Template talk:Campaignbox Bosnian War

Siege of Smoluća

As the article on this siege was deleted per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Siege of Smoluća (2nd nomination) due to non-notability, I'll remove it from the campaignbox, as keeping it there without any link wouldn't help anyone who searches infos on where or when this took place etc. In the AfD discussion it was suggested to mention it in some larger article on the operations in the Posavina region. I am not sure which article that would be as it is not even obvious which Smoluća we are talking about (Smoluća Donja? The article on this village does not mention any fighting but the infos on the demographics show an almost complete depopulation after 1991). If this is the right village, Majevica front (1992–1995) may come geographically close while Operation Corridor 92 is more to the north. So anybody who wants to preserve any information on this event may add one or two sentences (appropriately sourced) where it fits best. The redlink for Teočak and Priboj offensive may be kept, though, as there is a Draft:Teočak and Priboj offensive and therefore this link may turn blue in due time. --Proofreader (talk) 19:42, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bolding

Perhaps someone could explain the rationale behind which articles are bolded and which aren't? If an indication of importance, surely Operations Storm and Deliberate Force and the Dayton Agreement are major events? Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 03:14, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Debolded all, see Template:Campaignbox guidance, "The use of special formatting (such as bolding or changes in font size) in the list of battles – particularly to mark battles as "important" – is generally discouraged; while there are a few cases where such approaches may be both helpful to the reader and sufficiently well-sourced that they do not constitute original research, they are usually both unnecessary and potentially confusing.". Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 22:55, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Majevica front

These articles should be merged into the Majevica front (1992–1995) . : Battle of Banj brdo, Attack on Stolice, Assault on Majevica (1995). I don’t even know why some of these articles exist, and should just be deleted and merged into the Majevica article. They are poorly sourced and should just be added into the Majevica front article. SVK-arhiva (talk) 07:31, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree, at least regarding Assault on Majevica (1995). It is (now) well sourced and a solid MILHIST B-Class article, and covers an independently notable action of some significance. I haven't really looked at the sources for the others, but imagine that the 1994 attack on the same feature (currently at Attack on Stolice) will also have enough sources to stand alone. Majevica front (1992–1995) should be a parent summary article covering the ongoing fighting in the sector throughout the war, with child articles where there is sufficient material and reliable sources. On first glance, I reckon Battle of Banj brdo could be covered in the parent article. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 10:25, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]