Jump to content

Template talk:Atonement in Christianity

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

List has been alphabetized. Could be organized by prevalence in modern thought, or chronologically (by earliest distinct mention, i.e. Ransom/Recapitulation from Irenaeus, Christus Victor from Chrysostom, Athanasius or the Cappadocians, Satisfaction from Anselm [as Augustine isn't clear in his mention of it, he's mainly Christus Victor still], etc.). Also, divinization/theosis is an understanding of salvation among Eastern Orthodox, but is not a theory of the atonement - it is a theory of salvation or soteriology, held together with the Orthodox theory of the atonement, which is Christus Victor. St John Chrysostom Δόξατω Θεώ 09:23, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Another template question

[edit]

Ditto this template:

I have a problem with this template, as not all Arminians subscribe to a governmental view of atonement. The Free Will Baptists, for instance, and Arminius himself believed in the penal satisfaction view. See, again: Pinson, J. Matthew (2003). "Will the Real Arminius Please Stand Up? A Study of the Theology of Jacobus Arminius in Light of His Interpreters" (PDF). Integrity: A Journal of Christian Thought. 2: 121–139. TuckerResearch TuckerResearch (talk) 06:39, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Limited atonement and scholastics

[edit]

under limited atonement it lists the reformed and scholastic view but I dont think the scholastic theolgians believed in limited atonementIlikerabbits! (talk) 09:10, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]