Template talk:Anushtiginid dynasty family tree

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Genealogy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Genealogy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GenealogyWikipedia:WikiProject GenealogyTemplate:WikiProject GenealogyGenealogy articles

Asia

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Asia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Asia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject AsiaTemplate:WikiProject AsiaAsia articles

Biography

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Navbox

User:Qara xan why did you remove the {{navbox}}? -- PBS (talk) 22:47, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Why not? -- Qara Khan 22:57, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It allows those who are not interested in the tree to view and print the article with it collapsed. -- PBS (talk) 09:49, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

References

User:Qara xan the current references is not adequate for two reasons. The first reason is that it will only show up on this page it will not show up in article space. The second reason is that I have challenged the content and to support it the template needs inline citations (see WP:BURDEN). -- PBS (talk) 22:42, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User:Qara xan I intend to re-add the refimprove template, unless you have any objections. -- PBS (talk) 07:56, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Move content into article space and delete this template

User:Qara xan at the moment this template is only used in one article. Unless you envisage this template being used in other articles in the near future, I propose that the content is moved into Khwarazmian dynasty and this template is deleted. I am proposing this as to use transclusions is always confusing for new editors (and so is an impediment) and in this case it is not justified by the use of the same information in more than one article.

I am against deleting this template. Don't worry new users learn quickly :) -- Qara Khan 18:05, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you against moving the text into the article? -- PBS (talk) 21:47, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]