Template talk:Afghan Training Camps

Color

Would appreciate help with the sorting (by province), and some identifiable colour scheme as well. Sherurcij ^{(Speaker for the Dead)} 18:08, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why color? 74.13.107.111 (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 22:57, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"Prettiness" wasn't a good enough reason? :Þ Sherurcij ^{(Speaker for the Dead)} 00:52, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Name?

Why is this template called merely {{TrainingCamp}}? Surely other organization have training camps? I found a training camp in Snowdonia in Wales once -- run by and for some sort of British Army commando-type force. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 13:16, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I agree, and moved it. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:15, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

deprecated

Quba training camp Geo Swan (talk) 13:00, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

name and range

The title of the template is "Alleged Afghan Training Camps" but the template also includes a camp located in Bosnia and camps located in other counties. Should we change the title or should we remove camps that are not located in Afghanistan? IQinn (talk) 09:56, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest to remove the camps that are not located in Afghanistan and will do so in a few days if there is no objection. IQinn (talk) 05:35, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Done. IQinn (talk) 22:59, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Why didn't you consider rewriting the intro rather than removing information? Geo Swan (talk) 00:47, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The change of the default state of this template to "autocollapse"...

~~There were two discussions in March 2010, over when navigation templates should be collapsed.~~

User:Iqinn had been inserting explicit "state=autocollapse" on every instance they found, of certain navigation templates. They were inserting these explicit "state=autocollapse" with no explanation whatsoever.

~~In the March 2010 discussion Iqinn did offer explanations of sorts, for inserting those "state=autocollapse".~~

I think it was very clear, from those discussions, that no one accepted Iqinn's perceptions that the navigation templates violated WP:NPOV as a valid justification for autocollapsing templates. I encouraged Iqinn, many times, in many discussion pages, to address the perception that a navigation template was biased through discussion, on the navigation templates talk place.

I think it was very clear, from those discussions, that while certain wikiprojects have decided through consensus, that their navigation templates should have the property "state=autocollapsed" single individuals should not go and change this property on existing templates. The March discussions concerned over-riding the default state on specific instances. I believe this advice applies to changing the template's default state to autocollapse.

~~Yet Iqinn has changed the default state of this template to autocollapse, without any explanation whatsoever. Geo Swan (talk) 18:19, 30 July 2010 (UTC)~~[reply]

That is absolutely wrong. I did not recently modify the default state=autocollapse of this template nor at any other template. The editor who put this message up here User:Geo Swan has a long history of disruptive behavior including attacking other editors based on false information. I am going to strike his uncivil disruptive attack post. IQinn (talk) 22:51, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I stand corrected. Iqinn did not recently change the template's default state. The record does show they continued to autocollapse templates,without explanation, after the discussion above. Geo Swan (talk) 13:01, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That's wrong again. Geo Swan continues uncivil personal attacks are disruptive. IQinn (talk) 13:10, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]