Template talk:AfC draft editintro

the useless web

DO NOT USE

Misleading text

Re this: this has nothing to do with whether some people disagree with how the draft space is run. If this namespace is widely seen as being for temporary work, and if drafts that haven't been edited in six months become eligible for deletion, then telling newbies that they can edit any time they want and that there's no deadline, is plain wrong. Or is there anything I'm missing? – Uanfala (talk) 19:41, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Only the fact that this template isn't used anywhere. Primefac (talk) 11:04, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Well, that and the fact that if you're working on a draft, there is no deadline - if it doesn't sit for 6+ months it will never be G13'd. Primefac (talk) 11:05, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, how did I come across it then (I can't remember), and why is it on your watchlist? Do you know where the template used to be used? – Uanfala (talk) 11:43, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have every AFC template on my watchlist. It used to be used in the Article Wizard. Primefac (talk) 11:45, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I see. Maybe we should move it as a subpage of the old wizard, to prevent any more people getting confused? – Uanfala (talk) 11:47, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Doesn't really matter where it is if people can find it. Which makes me wonder, how did you find it? Primefac (talk) 12:24, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

As I said, I don't remember. But by whichever route I have arrived, I woudln't have assumed it was in use if the template had been a subpage under the old Article Wizard. – Uanfala (talk) 21:34, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]