Template talk:AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition

Frontier Edition

@ Mbevand Thank you for creating the table/template. However, the Frontier Edition is a Radeon Pro product, not an RX (consumer) product. This is per the source cited on this table, and others cited on the Radeon Pro article page. It should probably be removed from this template. Though a separate template of FE products would be useful for the Radeon Pro article. Dbsseven (talk) 17:22, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@ Dbsseven You are right. Shouldn't have added the RX Vega. Don't have time now to edit out the table, but feel free to do it. Mbevand (talk) 17:42, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@ Mbevand Glad we agree. I am actually going to move this template to a Radeon Frontier Edition template as that would be useful and current. Otherwise, the RX Vega template would just be empty. When the RX Vega parts come out we (someone) should create a new template. Dbsseven (talk) 19:28, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@ Dbsseven Sounds good. Mbevand (talk) 19:31, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@ Mbevand I guess we should have coordinated better. I created an Template:AMD Radeon RX Vega template yesterday. We should probably merge these two templates and delete one as they are redundant. Either way is fine, but I would suggest we atleast move over the content/cites as I would say they are more complete/reputable sources than wccftech. Dbsseven (talk) 15:17, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@ Dbsseven No problem, I'll delete my template. However I'll adjust your GFLOPS numbers because they are (slightly) incorrectly calculated (we have the same base & boost clock source information, so it's not a discrepancy in our sources, just slightly incorrect math). Mbevand (talk) 20:37, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]