Template talk:2014 Atlantic Coast Conference football standings

This template is within the scope of WikiProject College football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of college football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.College footballWikipedia:WikiProject College footballTemplate:WikiProject College footballcollege football articles

Years

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Years, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Years on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YearsWikipedia:WikiProject YearsTemplate:WikiProject YearsYears articles

United States

This template is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.

United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles

Notre Dame

They don't belong here.122.1.124.211 (talk) 00:38, 18 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

While Notre Dame maintains football independence, the are in a contract agreement to play 5 ACC "conference games" and they are directly linked to the ACC bowl rotation. The standings template clearly reflects that and provides a more accurate as well as a useful representation for the season. Having Notre Dame on the "independent" template with BYU, Army and Navy shows no relevance for the post season. Nolephin (talk) 14:42, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

As you just said, they are an independent. Regardless of the contract, the are not in the ACC. They should be in the independent template with a note about the ACC. Separating one independent team from the others makes no sense. People will look for Notre Dame in the independent section not the ACC section.Correctron (talk) 23:32, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]