Jump to content

Template talk:Box Drawings Light Vertical

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Template talk:¡)

Requested move 19 April 2021

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved to Template:Box Drawings Light Vertical by User:Ceyockey (non-admin closure) * Pppery * it has begun... 18:11, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Template:¡Template:Spaced pipe – More obvious name; it makes little sense to me for a template used to produce a non-ASCII character to have a different non-ASCII characters as its name. * Pppery * it has begun... 00:32, 19 April 2021 (UTC) Relisting. (t · c) buidhe 23:10, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support alternate move to Template:Box Drawings Light Vertical per the Unicode designation and WP:TMPG which says Template function should be clear from the template name, but redirects can be created to assist everyday use of very popular templates. This is consistent with most Category:Character-substitution templates which use the long designations. The U2502 suggestion can be created as a redirect if desired. -- Netoholic @ 06:16, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support a move somewhere to clarify the template, as noted before although we may abbreviate more in template space the title doesn't even appear to relate to its function of a |. Crouch, Swale (talk) 08:01, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per Netoholic. Redirects can allow other people to use alternative names for the same template. LSGH (talk) (contributions) 09:36, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.