Jump to content

Template:GABox/doc

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Usage

[edit]
Horizontal layout:

{{subst:GABox|1a=|1b=|2a=|2b=|2c=|2d=|3a=|3b=|4=|5=|6a=|6b=|7=}}

Vertical layout:

{{subst:GABox
|1a=
|1b=
|2a=
|2b=
|2c=
|2d=
|3a=
|3b=
|4=
|5=
|6a=
|6b=
|7=
}}

Available arguments are the following; any other argument or no argument at all gives an undecided mark. Note that the template should be substituted, as the GA guidelines are reviewed from time to time and this template may be changed.

TemplateData

[edit]
This is the TemplateData for this template used by TemplateWizard, VisualEditor and other tools. See a monthly parameter usage report for Template:GABox in articles based on its TemplateData.

TemplateData for GABox

Review template for Good Article nominees

Template parameters

This template prefers inline formatting of parameters.

ParameterDescriptionTypeStatus
Criterion 1a1a

Well written; the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.

Suggested values
yes no ? wtf hold neu
Stringsuggested
Criterion 1b1b

Well written; the article complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.

Suggested values
yes no ? wtf hold neu
Stringsuggested
Criterion 2a2a

Verifiable with no original research: it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline

Suggested values
yes no ? wtf hold neu
Stringsuggested
Criterion 2b2b

Verifiable with no original research: all inline citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines;

Suggested values
yes no ? wtf hold neu
Stringsuggested
Criterion 2c2c

Verifiable with no original research: the article contains no original research

Suggested values
yes no ? wtf hold neu
Stringsuggested
Criterion 2d2d

Verifiable with no original research: the article contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism

Suggested values
yes no ? wtf hold neu
Stringsuggested
Criterion 3a3a

Broad in its coverage: the article addresses the main aspects of the topic

Suggested values
yes no ? wtf hold neu
Stringsuggested
Criterion 3b3b

Broad in its coverage: the article stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail

Suggested values
yes no ? wtf hold neu
Stringsuggested
Criterion 44

Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each

Suggested values
yes no ? wtf hold neu
Stringsuggested
Criterion 55

Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute

Suggested values
yes no ? wtf hold neu
Stringsuggested
Criterion 6a6a

Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content

Suggested values
yes no ? wtf hold neu
Stringsuggested
Criterion 6b6b

Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: media are relevant to the topic and have suitable captions

Suggested values
yes no ? wtf hold neu
Stringsuggested
Overall status7

Overall status of the article being reviewed

Suggested values
yes no ? wtf hold neu
Stringsuggested
  • y, yes, pass, good, ok, k, +, aye all produce a pass symbol:
  • n, no, fail, bad, nk, -, nay all produce a fail symbol:
  • ?, ??, ???, dunno, question, huh all produce a question symbol:
  • wtf produces Wikipedia's "I am out of my comfort zone" symbol:
  • hold and on hold produce the on hold symbol:
  • neu, neutral and und produce the neutral symbol:
  • blank or no input produces the unassessed symbol