Template:Did you know nominations/Yunxian Man
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 15:50, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Yunxian Man
.jpg)
Yunxian 1 in the Hubei Provincial Museum, showing skull deformation
- ... that the skulls of Yunxian Man are "relatively complete" despite being heavily crushed?
- Source: Nature article (ref 1 in article), https://www.nature.com/articles/357404a0
- Reviewed:
- Comment: I don't mind if the image isn't used, but I found it very interesting. I will fix the remaining citation needed templates and possibly expand the article more today.
Created by Toadspike (talk).
Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.Toadspike (talk) 08:49, 6 May 2024 (UTC).
Looks to be easily verifiable, but "relatively complete" should be mentioned somewhere in the wiki article. While I would prefer the article be organized into sections, I don't think that's a requirement for DYK. Just resolve the "citation needed" issues first before I approve it. And yes, I do see the comment. PrimalMustelid (talk) 12:39, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Toadspike I would suggest that the first sentence should mention Yunxian Man, otherwise the article may fail the presentability test. I notice that the article was moved this morning, so it may be a work in progress. TSventon (talk) 15:55, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you both for your comments, I have improved the article to resolve them. It is still a little bit of a work in progress, as there is a lot more information in the sources than I originally anticipated, but I'm going for DYK, not GA, so it should be okay as is :D Toadspike (talk) 12:13, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
The article quality's a start, so I'll approve for DYK. PrimalMustelid (talk) 15:59, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you both for your comments, I have improved the article to resolve them. It is still a little bit of a work in progress, as there is a lot more information in the sources than I originally anticipated, but I'm going for DYK, not GA, so it should be okay as is :D Toadspike (talk) 12:13, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Toadspike I would suggest that the first sentence should mention Yunxian Man, otherwise the article may fail the presentability test. I notice that the article was moved this morning, so it may be a work in progress. TSventon (talk) 15:55, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
