The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by BlueMoonset (talk) 20:16, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
Article was only 3x expanded, well short of the 5x expansion; student nominator has not responded to pings, so closing as unsuccessful.
... that the yellow-bellied toad can change its coloration significantly when moved to a different location? Source: Preißler K, Rodríguez A, Pröhl H. Evidence for coloration plasticity in the yellow‐bellied toad, Bombina variegata. Ecol Evol. 2021;11: 17557–17567. doi:10.1002/ece3.8391
New enough: - Article has been expanded from about 4,100 characters to 12,641, a healthy and commendable expansion of a little over 3x but still short of the 5x threshold.
Overall: This article is in pretty good condition but it still needs significant (+~8,000-character) expansion to be eligible for DYK. Also, if you'd like to include a picture with this nomination, there are lots of lovely options from this page. Anikavarsani, are you interested in trying to continue expanding this article to hit the 5x threshold to make it eligible for DYK? —Collintc 19:56, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
Unless Anikavarsani signals their intent to take this article down the stretch, I think it's probably time to close this one up. theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 22:09, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
Yep, I'd be happy to give two more days for a response to let us know if Anikavarsani is interested in continuing to expand the article; otherwise, we can close this one on October 22. Thanks —Collintc 03:07, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
I've left them a message on their talk page. If they still do not respond afterwards I think this can be closed. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 03:26, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
Anikavarsani, as there hasn't been any movement on the article in over a week, I'm unfortunately going to have to reject this article from Did You Know as it doesn't meet the 5× expansion criterion. I do hope you'll continue doing this good work on other articles as, though you didn't hit a 5× expansion, you did greatly improve the article over its earlier form. I hope to see another of your articles on DYK sometime soon! Kindly —Collintc 16:43, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
- Article has been expanded from about 4,100 characters to 12,641, a healthy and commendable expansion of a little over 3x but still short of the 5x threshold.
This article is in pretty good condition but it still needs significant (+~8,000-character) expansion to be eligible for DYK. Also, if you'd like to include a picture with this nomination, there are lots of lovely options from this page. Anikavarsani, are you interested in trying to continue expanding this article to hit the 5x threshold to make it eligible for DYK? —Collint c 19:56, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
Unless Anikavarsani signals their intent to take this article down the stretch, I think it's probably time to close this one up. theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 22:09, 20 October 2022 (UTC)