Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Worth It (TV series)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:10, 15 November 2018 (UTC)

Worth It (TV series)

[edit]
  • ... that viewers have watched 1.5 billion minutes of BuzzFeed's Worth It in 2018 alone? Source: [1]

Created/expanded by The ed17 (talk). Self-nominated at 04:01, 22 September 2018 (UTC).

  • New and long enough, a copyvio check reveals no problems, hook content is interesting and is verified with a citation to a reliable source in the article. Matters to be resolved: 1) The Episodes section has no sources, 2) QPQ needs to be completed. North America1000 08:49, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
  • @The ed17: I don't want to be a stickler, but Wikipedia:How to write a plot summary is an opinion essay, whereas per D2 of the DYK Supplementary guidelines states, "A rule of thumb is one inline citation per paragraph, excluding the lead, plot summaries, and paragraphs which summarize other cited content." I'm not sure that the first table in the Episodes section could be considered as a plot summary, because it's not. Rather, it's a list. Also, the airing dates in that first episodes box are not sourced anywhere else in the article. Furthermore, the external links you added to the article with all of the YouTube links could potentially violate WP:NOTDIR. North America1000 18:22, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
  • I mean, I could convert it all to citation templates, but functionally it'd be the same thing—taking airing dates and credits straight from the linked videos. That's exactly why plot summaries aren't required to have citations. (Also, I didn't add the tables, a new user did. ;-) ) Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 18:25, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
  • (ec) Also, the Worth It: Lifestyle Episodes section has no sources as well. The problem is, when you finish your QPQ, if I were to then just say, "oh well, I guess it's fine", another user can then come along and state how 1) the review was in error and 2) that the article doesn't qualify without some sources in these sections. Seems easier just to add some sources. North America1000 18:27, 22 September 2018 (UTC)