Template:Did you know nominations/Woke
Appearance
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 22:50, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Woke
[edit]- ... that Bloomberg Businesweek asked, "Is Wikipedia woke?" Source: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2016-12-22/how-woke-is-wikipedia-s-editorial-pool
- ALT1:... that ...? Source: "You are strongly encouraged to quote the source text supporting each hook" (and [link] the source, or cite it briefly without using citation templates)
- Reviewed: Liebenberg and Kaplan
Created by Gamaliel (talk). Self-nominated at 18:45, 26 December 2016 (UTC).
This article seems like it's ready to promote. Full review:
- Sourcing direct source to Bloomberg Businesweek, a RS
- Hook short enough and interesting (a wikilink to Bloomberg Businessweek would be nice, but not required)
- Newness article created December 26
- Length long enough
- QPQ in progress - Liebenberg and Kaplan
- Image none
- NPOV yes
- Copyvio Earwig reports violation unlikely at 24.8%
- General policies compliant with all general policies relevant to DYK
DarjeelingTea (talk) 04:47, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
- Hi, I came by to promote this, but notice that it is an orphan. Could you link this page to at least one other Wikipedia article? Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 22:14, 10 January 2017 (UTC)