Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/William of Canterbury

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Round symbols for illustrating comments about the DYK nomination The following is an archived discussion of William of Canterbury's DYK nomination. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived nomination"s (talk) page, the nominated article's (talk) page, or the Did you knowDYK comment symbol (talk) page. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. No further edits should be made to this page. See the talk page guidelines for (more) information.

The result was: promoted by PanydThe muffin is not subtle 16:08, 9 April 2013 (UTC).

William of Canterbury

[edit]

Created by Ealdgyth (talk). Self nominated at 19:19, 4 April 2013 (UTC).

  • Article - created new on 4 April, so new enough; 2603 characters of readable prose, so long enough; neutral; at least one inline citation to every paragraph; no copy vios detected using earwig, no online source so can't use duplication detector; assessed as start class on one project, un-assessed on others, so not a stub.
  • Hook - within length criteria at 141 characters; correctly formatted (I put the article name in bold); part of hook cited to ref #2 towards the end of the first paragraph; and interesting.
  • QPQ done; no images.
I've temporarily inserted a {{cn}} template where I feel a reference needs to be placed immediately at the end of the sentence to support the other part of the hook. SagaciousPhil - Chat 12:18, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
that was covered by the footnote following but I've put in a duplicated footnote. Ealdgyth - Talk 13:14, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
  • Great, thank you! Looks fine to me now. SagaciousPhil - Chat 13:41, 5 April 2013 (UTC)