Template:Did you know nominations/Wendhausen Windmill

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Keilana|^{Parlez ici} 01:14, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

Wendhausen Windmill

(

)

Wendhausen Windmill

~~... that Wendhausen Windmill (pictured) is the only complete five-sailed windmill in Germany?~~
ALT ... that weddings were first performed in Wendhausen Windmill (pictured) in 2001?

Reviewed: ~~QPQ not needed as this is not a self-nom. Mjroots QPQ to do. (talk) 06:48, 13 July 2015 (UTC)~~
- HMS Perseverance (1781) Mjroots (talk) 07:54, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

Created by Ks03 (talk). Nominated by Mjroots (talk) at 06:48, 13 July 2015 (UTC).

Please fix the citation tag.--Nvvchar. 18:34, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

The one you added, despite the image that backs the fact up? Mjroots (talk) 18:45, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

I've been made aware off-Wiki that there are other five-sailed windmills standing in Germany, so I've withdrawn the original hook and added an ALT hook. Mjroots (talk) 18:45, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

I'd be interested to see the source that states there is more than one operable/functioning five-sailed windmill in Germany. I haven't found one and all sources point to Wendhausen as the only one. There was a five-sailed windmill (fünfflügelige windmuhle) in Flemmingen but is no longer active and needs extreme reconstruction. Also one in Zittau but not longer exists. There is also a replica at the International Windmill and Watermill Museum in nearby Gifhorn. Maybe that's the one you are referring to? Ks03 (talk) 19:52, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

@Ks03: - discussion here, but be prepared for the criticism! Mjroots (talk) 20:52, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

Mjroots - Wow, didn't expect that. Thanks for sharing tho, good feedback for someone trying to improve wikipedia for the Lehre area. If the guy knows that much, he'd do a benefit to all by actually updating the wiki with the "facts." :) Not sure he answered the concern that the windmill is the only five-sailed windmill still functioning in Germany. Based on the Wendhausen websites and newspapers, it's the only one remaining. He himself said a number were torn down or no longer worked/functioned. :) And yes, he may have valid corrections for other items. Maybe we can suggest that he can help the cause instead of only pointing out the faults! :) Oh, and yes, I'm am an English speaker, and a novice German speaker working to improve. Ks03 (talk) 21:20, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
Adding: The one is correct about converting the water mill to a windmill at the same location. They replaced the watermill, not necessarily at the same location and I should have noted that. I'll correct it in the next day or so.

Mjroots, please note that a QPQ is required for all nominators with five or more DYK credits, whether it's a self-nom or not. Since you have at least 241 credits, you are required to do a QPQ review. MANdARAX • XAЯAbИAM 01:25, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

@Mandruss: - another rule changed then. When QPQ was brought in, it was only for self-noms. Mjroots (talk) 06:04, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

Close, no cigar. Pinging Mandarax. ―Mandruss ☎ 06:57, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

I don't know why I was pinged. To verify the rule change? Yes, non-self-noms used to be exempt from QPQs, but, as the result of an RfC, the rule was changed about eight months ago. MANdARAX • XAЯAbИAM 08:06, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

ALT2 ... that the Wendhausen Windmill (pictured) is the only five-sailed windmill in Germany still in operation? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ks03 (talk • contribs) 04:42, 16 July 2015‎ (UTC)

Mjroots, it's been three weeks since the above posts, and you have not yet provided a QPQ review, though you have been active on Wikipedia in the interim. Please supply one within a week if you wish to continue pursuing this nomination. Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 02:24, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
@BlueMoonset: I will do a review by Sunday at the very latest. Thx for your patience. Mjroots (talk) 14:52, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

That will be fine; thanks for letting us know. BlueMoonset (talk) 14:54, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

QPQ now done. Mjroots (talk) 07:54, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

Full review needed now that QPQ has been submitted. BlueMoonset (talk) 16:14, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
Seems neutral, its long enough and is well cited to German sources. Hook fact checks out with google translate and I added the dyk citation for the hook. German sources so I'm AGFing the paraphrasing check. Image is fine. Nice article. Thanks. Victuallers (talk) 15:14, 20 August 2015 (UTC)