The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 08:39, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
Overall: Article meets eligibility criteria - 5x expanded. Meets length expectations, is well sourced and is neutral. Earwig seems to be down, will come back for Copyvio checks, though I would be surprised if it shows up an issue. All good on Earwig. Hook is interesting and is cited / referenced to a FCC licensing letter / case finding. Question to the nominator - I think this sourcing is good, but, do you think this might constitute a primary source? In addition, can we find a secondary source as well. If this is difficult, I am good to go with this source. QPQ done. Ktin (talk) 17:35, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
@Ktin: Any news report will necessarily quote this very letter; one such source is already included in the article generally. I think it is an acceptable source. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 21:53, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Sounds good. Marking this nomination as approved. Nicely done. Thanks. Ktin (talk) 21:56, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Article meets eligibility criteria - 5x expanded. Meets length expectations, is well sourced and is neutral.