The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Lightburst (talk) 15:46, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: - Offline/paywalled citation accepted in good faith
Interesting:
QPQ: Done.
Overall: Aarticle length and age are fine. No copyvio or plagiarism concerns. QPQ and Status updated to y. Thanks. Path2space (talk) 20:24, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
@Path2space: Welcome to DYK reviewing. I did a QPQ, so you need to mark "y" in the |qpq= field, and why is the status "again"? Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 21:11, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
@Path2space: If the DYK is fine, you put "y" in the |status= parameter. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 01:40, 6 August 2023 (UTC)