Template:Did you know nominations/Victoria Price
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 07:39, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Victoria Price
[edit]- ... that Victoria Price, the daughter of horror icon Vincent Price, is not a fan of horror films?
Created by Rjmail (talk). Self-nominated at 14:16, 18 June 2015 (UTC).
The article is new and long enough, submitted within the time limit. The hook is short, simple and straight to the point. The point of the hook can be easily found in both sources. The user appears to only have one DYK article before this, so there's no need for QPC. My only comment is that in the first paragraph of Selected Publications, it would be better if you can put the ISBN code as a reference instead of putting it in the same sentence. Perhaps you can add references that indicate the book was released in 1999 and re-released in 2014 too.- Thank you, I've made your suggested changes. Rjmail (talk) 16:02, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
- I made small edits yesterday to the article. I think this nomination is good to go, since the hook and the article are in great shape per my review above. SyFuelIgniteBurned 01:57, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
I've tagged the article for over-reliance on primary sources, especially the subject's own book and blog pages. The hook is also sourced to these types of sources. Please provide more reliable sources to prove notability. Yoninah (talk) 14:59, 23 June 2015 (UTC)- Ok at this point out of 15 cites, 2 are her personal blog, but it is speaking of things directly relating to herself, which I believe WP:BLP allows, and I don't think DYK Hook disallows that. At the point of using those two cites, I also used one from a different source to help back things up a little more. Since the entire hook is in that different source, I could remove the personal blog ones, but I thought I would leave them in to help back up the cite to the original quote. What do you think?
