Template:Did you know nominations/Vern Miller

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Allen3 ^talk 16:25, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

Vern Miller

(

)

... that in 1971, Kansas Attorney General Vern Miller participated in an undercover drug raid by hiding in a trunk of a car in order to make arrests?

ALT1:.. that Vern Miller was elected Attorney General of Kansas in 1970 despite having never tried a case in court before?
Reviewed: pending

Created by Connormah (talk). Self-nominated at 20:59, 17 October 2015 (UTC).

- Article was reviewed against criteria one through seven and found satisfactory. Queue it up. LavaBaron (talk) 11:34, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

QPQ has not been done yet. -Zanhe (talk) 18:30, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

New reviewer needed to do a thorough review and provide details of what was checked. DYK review instructions please begin with one of the 6 review symbols that appear at the top of the edit screen, and then indicate all aspects of the article that you have reviewed. Details that are supposed to be checked in a review can be found at DYKReviewing guide — Maile (talk) 12:18, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

As per administrator ruling here, it's been determined no more detailed review is needed. A QPQ has been contributed by reviewer LavaBaron on behalf of nominator Connormah here - Template:Did you know nominations/American Pastoral (film) - so this is now clear for queue. LavaBaron (talk) 04:39, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
There was no such administrator ruling or determination; reinstating Maile's request for a new reviewer. BlueMoonset (talk) 13:59, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
A discussion in DYK Talk has failed consensus that the review is unacceptable; I don't want to engage in vote-counting but, to make things concise, I'll note 4 editors have proferred the belief it is acceptable, 4 have objected, and 2 have unclear opinions. For lack of a consensus to overturn the review, it is clear for queue. LavaBaron (talk) 15:36, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

QPQ still not provided. Do not promote without the QPQ being provided. Although LavaBaron generously donated one of his reviews as a QPQ, it's a review without details (as the original one above) and is questionable if it can be used as such. — Maile (talk) 23:22, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

Please don't hold-up Connormah's nom with WP:POINTYy objections based on discussions currently ongoing at DYK Talk, particularly ones that are so vague they would be irreconcilable ("questionable if ..."). In the absence of an objection with an articulated offer of resolution, this is cleared for queue. LavaBaron (talk) 01:10, 25 October 2015 (UTC)