Template:Did you know nominations/UNESCO Universal Declaration on Cultural Diversity

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 22:19, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

UNESCO Universal Declaration on Cultural Diversity

(

)

... that the UNESCO Universal Declaration on Cultural Diversity includes value systems, traditions, and beliefs in its definition of culture? Source: "..the concept of culture itself, which 2001 UNESCO addressed in one of its most recent instruments, namely the Universal Declaration on Cultural Diversity. UNESCO has espoused the anthropological understanding of culture [...] encompassing, in addition to art and literature, lifestyles, ways of living together, value systems, traditions and beliefs." (Stamatopoulouo 2007 p77) See also text of the declaration (page 12 of this document).
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/WEMG (Tennessee)
- Comment: The bulk of the expansion was done a little over a week ago. I ask for clemency because I've been offline for a while due to a family medical emergency.

It would be timely to run this on the front page on 21 May, which is UN World Day for Cultural Diversity for Dialogue and Development.

5x expanded by MartinPoulter (talk). Self-nominated at 11:14, 12 May 2022 (UTC).

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall:

Article 5x expansion confirmed. Articles of the declaration has appropriate use of quotations (where necessary) so passes earwig and is adequately sourced. No close paraphrasing was found, and the hook is interesting and straightforward, cited inline, and verified. QPQ done. Nom good to go. Pseud 14 (talk) 16:06, 15 May 2022 (UTC) Pseud 14 (talk) 16:38, 29 May 2022 (UTC)