Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Train Track Park (Jerusalem)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:25, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

Train Track Park (Jerusalem)

[edit]
Train Track Park, Jerusalem
Train Track Park, Jerusalem

Source: "שדרה ירוקה מחברת בין שכונות מגוונות בירושלים ומצליחה להפגיש קהילות שונות, כך שבאותה הרצועה ניתן למצוא יהודים וערבים, חרדים וחילונים שמצליחים ליהנות ביחד מקצת טבע." (A green boulevard connects various neighborhoods in Jerusalem and manages to bring together different communities, so that in the same strip you can find Jews and Arabs, ultra-Orthodox and secular who manage to enjoy a bit of nature together) Walla!); "הפארק, יוזמה קהילתית שגברה על יוזמות להקמת כביש, חוצה שכונות יהודיות ושכונה ערבית אחת, ובזכותו נוצר מפגש של תושבים שונים בתנועה, רצים, ...צועדים, רוכבים, מטיילים עם הכלב" (The park, a community initiative that has overcome initiatives to erect a roadway, crosses Jewish neighborhoods and one Arab neighborhood, creating a meeting point between different residents pursuing activities, running, walking, cycling, strolling with the dog...) Haaretz)

Created by Yoninah (talk). Self-nominated at 13:02, 24 April 2017 (UTC).

  • Review by Maile
QPQ
  • QPQ review by Yoninah has not been used as a QPQ on any other nomination
Eligibility
  • Article created by Yoninah on April 23, 2017, and has 5827 characters (0 words) "readable prose size"
  • Article is NPOV, currently stable, no dispute tags
Sourcing
  • Citations are appropriately placed in every paragraph and correctly formatted
  • No bare URLs, and no external links used as inline sources
  • AGF on non-English sourcing
Hook
  • Origiinal hook is 165 characters, NPOV, stated in the article with a nice quote box and sourced appropriately - striking that one, since the nominator expressed concern over the clarity of the two trails being separate.
  • ALT1 hook is 157 characters, NPOV, stated in the article and sourced
  • ALT2 hook is 183 characters, NPOV, stated in the article and sourced
Image
  • Image used is in the article, is the nominator's own work, and uploaded on Commons with the share-alike license
Tools
  • Earwig's Copyvio Detector showed no issues of concern
  • Duplication Detector was run on English language sourcing and showed no issues of concern
  • Also, reading through the sourcing as I checked the hooks, I didn't see any issues of concern
  • Dab Solver says there are no dab links in the article
  • Checklinks tool shows that all external links are good links, live and working properly

This passes. I like ALT1 hook best, only because I favor getting the article link as close to the beginning of the hook as possible. But ALT2 also works. Struck the original hook, since you expressed concern about its clarity. Thank you for writing this. It was really nice to read about this park. Giving two ticks to cover both the English language and non-English sourcing. — Maile (talk) 22:18, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

  • Maile thanks for the review! Looking at it a day later, I think ALT1 works best, too. Striking ALT2. Yoninah (talk) 22:20, 24 April 2017 (UTC)