Template:Did you know nominations/Time Traveler (roller coaster)
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 15:20, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Time Traveler (roller coaster)
[edit]- ... that upon its completion at Silver Dollar City in 2018, Time Traveler became the tallest and fastest complete-circuit spinning roller coaster in the world? Source: (Amusement Today) (The Kansas City Star)
- ALT1:... that upon its completion at Silver Dollar City in 2018, Time Traveler became the world's first spinning roller coaster to feature three inversions? Source: (RCDB)
- ALT2:... that the spinning roller coaster Time Traveler uses an eddy current brake underneath each car to control the ride's spin? Source: (Funworld Magazine)
- Reviewed: Mary Stuart Fisher
Pending (I've had one DYK published (though I know the exemption for QPQ is 5), I wish to partake in a review and will post soon).
- Reviewed: Mary Stuart Fisher
Improved to Good Article status by Adog (talk). Self-nominated at 20:31, 15 March 2019 (UTC).
Article gained GA status, and was nominated for DYK on time. It is long enogh and neutral. "Earwig's Copyvio Detector" reports high-rate text similarities, even paragraph-long: 51.0% at [1], 23.7% at [2], 23.7% at [3], 15.3% at [4], 15.3% at [5], 12.3% at [6]. Copyediting is needed. The hook is well-formatted (I prefer the original one). Its length is within limit and its fact is cited inline. QPQ was done. CeeGee 16:05, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
- CeeGee; Hmm, I don't think it needs a copy edit. The video description seems to be a copy and paste of the article's page well before the video was published (1), same goes for the two sources from "IndianPoint" as the article's content was first (2) & (3), the rest (4-6) are used as quotes in the reception of the article (or share common words/phrases within the article as other sources use as well) and thus doesn't seem to be a problem as they're properly cited thereafter. You would think the GA reviewer would see that, if not, then the article wouldn't have passed so easily. :P Adog (Talk・Cont) 18:34, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
CeeGee 10:52, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
This article is a newly-promoted GA and is new enough and long enough. The hook facts are cited inline and any of the hooks could be used, the article is neutral and I detected no copyright issues, although other sites seem to have copied Wikipedia. A QPQ has been done. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:41, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
