Overall: I’m not at all an experienced reviewer (or editor for that matter) but I believe I understand the DYK criteria well rn to try and help out with the backlog, so if anyone else has comments or if I did something wrong by all means please bring them up! I’d like to particularly request a second opinion on the image licensing (since I’m not sure how having people in a self work affects things). PixDeVlyell talk to me! 16:10, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
@PixDeVl: Leads do not require citations (see WP:LEADCITE). Also, you can definitely use images of other people if they're not copyright violations. Let me know if you have any questions! ~ Pbritti (talk) 16:15, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
PS: remember to post {{subst:DYKproblem|[Name of article]|header=yes|sig=yes}} on the relevant user's talk page when you review a hook and don't pass it. ~ Pbritti (talk) 16:19, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
@Pbritti: Fixed the lead part, someone on the Discord also mentioned WP:LEADCITE, so thank you both, I'll keep it in mind next time I do a review, as well as the notice. Thank you! I'd personally pass this, but at the least for this first and maybe few other reviews, I'll leave it as requesting a second opinion. --PixDeVlyell talk to me! 16:35, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
Providing a second opinion here on PixDeVl's request off-wiki. The initial review was mostly good and it looks like the LEADCITE thing was clarified above; no problems there. The image is correctly licensed, which isn't affected by having people as its subject in this context, at least in the United States. The only other concern I had was on the use of Aleteia as a source, as it was criticized at an RSN discussion. However, their about page indicates they have some editorial oversight and the article only uses them for uncontroversial information, so I don't think this is a sticking issue. Approved! —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 16:42, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
@TechnoSquirrel69: Thanks for the review and helping the new editor! ~ Pbritti (talk) 21:23, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
I’m not at all an experienced reviewer (or editor for that matter) but I believe I understand the DYK criteria well rn to try and help out with the backlog, so if anyone else has comments or if I did something wrong by all means please bring them up! I’d like to particularly request a second opinion on the image licensing (since I’m not sure how having people in a self work affects things). PixDeVl 
Fixed the lead part, someone on the Discord also mentioned WP:LEADCITE, so thank you both, I'll keep it in mind next time I do a review, as well as the notice. 
Thank you! I'd personally pass this, but at the least for this first and maybe few other reviews, I'll leave it as requesting a second opinion. --PixDeVl 
Approved! —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 16:42, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
