Template:Did you know nominations/The Feast of Bacchus (Philips Koninck)

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Hilst talk 17:58, 31 March 2024 (UTC)

The Feast of Bacchus (Philips Koninck)

(

)

The Feast of Bacchus by Philips Koninck

... that The Feast of Bacchus (pictured) went viral following a football game? Source: NYT: You Saw Jason Kelce. This Guy Saw The Feast of Bacchus.
- ALT1: ... that The Feast of Bacchus (pictured), once described as an allegory of the five senses, went viral following a football game? Source: Honor to Bacchus: An Allegory of the Five Senses
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Deshong Art Museum 2

emergency backlog mode QPQ: Template:Did you know nominations/Boquila

Created by Zeete (talk). Self-nominated at 12:52, 13 March 2024 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/The Feast of Bacchus (Philips Koninck); consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
Freely licensed: Used in article: Clear at 100px:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: @Zeete: The article was created on 13 March. It has a readable prose size of 2780 characters. WP:EARWIG did not find any copyright violations. The hooks are interesting and supported by the sources. I think ALT0 is better since it is probably not obvious to readers how the two claims in ALT1 are connected to each other. QPQ was done. The image looks good and fulfills the license requirements. Each claim has a reference but I'm not particularly happy about the three Twitter/X sources. The claims they support are relatively basic so I'm not sure whether replacing them is strictly speaking necessary but it would be good if that is possible. What is your take on them? Phlsph7 (talk) 15:14, 16 March 2024 (UTC)

@Phlsph7: Thanks for your review. The main reference is the New York Times article. I've adjusted the refs to make this clearer. The twitter refs were there to help readers find the originals. Does this help? Thanks, Zeete (talk) 19:41, 16 March 2024 (UTC)

Thanks, looks good. Phlsph7 (talk) 08:17, 17 March 2024 (UTC)