Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/The Building of Skadar

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Round symbols for illustrating comments about the DYK nomination The following is an archived discussion of The Building of Skadar's DYK nomination. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived nomination"s (talk) page, the nominated article's (talk) page, or the Did you knowDYK comment symbol (talk) page. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. No further edits should be made to this page. See the talk page guidelines for (more) information.

The result was: promoted by Mentoz86 (talk) 20:14, 25 March 2013 (UTC).

The Building of Skadar, Old Rashko

[edit]

Created by Antidiskriminator (talk). Self nominated at 08:51, 6 March 2013 (UTC).

  • Both articles new enough, long enough, well-sourced, no close paraphrasing seen. 2 QPQs done. Hook ref verified. However, the hook fact should appear in both articles per DYK rules.
  • Personally, I think the assessment of von Goethe that the poem is "superstitiously barbaric" is much more hooky, as is any of the barbaric description of the poem, or a mention of the motif of human sacrifice.
  • BTW, I tried to italicize the page title of The Building of Skadar, without success. Can you help? Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 23:17, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
  • The hook fact is now mentioned in both articles. Thank you for your formatting suggestion. I don't agree that Goethe's assessment is more hooky. --Antidiskriminator (talk) 09:05, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
  • Hook fact is verified and appears in both articles. Good to go. Yoninah (talk) 11:35, 24 March 2013 (UTC)