Template:Did you know nominations/Symphony No. 1 (Kalinnikov)
Appearance
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:36, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Symphony No. 1 (Kalinnikov), Vasily Kalinnikov
- ... that Vasily Kalinnikov composed his Symphony No. 1 while suffering from tuberculosis in Yalta?
- Comment: Source can be found in Vasily Kalinnikov and Symphony No. 1 (Kalinnikov)
Moved to mainspace by GeneralPoxter (talk). Self-nominated at 00:52, 30 October 2019 (UTC).
- Obviously, only the article on the 1st symphony can be reviewed, the article on the composer himself is definitely not recent enough. That article on the 1st symphony is well sourced and written without noticeable mistakes, at least in my eyes. The hook is alright as well. However, the problem with the article is that it was created on 27 September but only nominated today! This contravenes Eligibility criteria a: "For DYK purposes, a "new" article is no more than seven days old, and may not consist of text spun off from a pre-existing article.", and thus this nomination must, sadly, be rejected. Edelseider (talk) 11:14, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
- @Edelseider: It appears that this was the nominator's first nomination and may not have been familiar with the requirement. Would it be fine to grant a one-time IAR exception for this case, or is it just too late? Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 01:11, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Narutolovehinata5: I think that it is really too late now, especially since the nominator himself didn't object. But feel free to ask for a second opinion on the matter. All the best, Edelseider (talk) 06:42, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
- I left the nominator another talk page message inviting them to comment here again. If they still wish to pursue the nomination, I can start a discussion on DYK for the date requirement to be waived. But if they are fine with this being closed, then the nomination can be closed. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 10:03, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Narutolovehinata5: I think that it is really too late now, especially since the nominator himself didn't object. But feel free to ask for a second opinion on the matter. All the best, Edelseider (talk) 06:42, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Edelseider: It appears that this was the nominator's first nomination and may not have been familiar with the requirement. Would it be fine to grant a one-time IAR exception for this case, or is it just too late? Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 01:11, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
- Thank you for your response. I did not know that the articles nominated for DYK had to be at most 7 days old. I would certainly appreciate an IAR exception. GeneralPoxter (talk) 18:22, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
- This one was brought up at WT:DYK, and it looks like IAR is fine in this case. A word of advice here is that you can only nominate articles that you have worked up to the criteria yourself, so Symphony No. 1 is fine, but not the other one. You can include regular links to articles that don't meet the criteria, so I've made some changes. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 16:12, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
- There appears to be consensus to give the nominator a one-time exemption from the newness requirement. Nomination is ready for a full review. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 01:11, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Everything is fine as stated above (minus the delay problem that has been dealt with), except that any article on a particular piece of music should include a discography (a list of available recordings). Please add a discography, and then, all will be fine! Edelseider (talk) 13:36, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- ALT1:
... that Vasily Kalinnikov composed his Symphony No. 1 in Yalta, where he recovered from tuberculosis? - because I understand he caught the desease before moving there. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:15, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- He didn't recover from tuberculosis, he unfortunately succumbed to the disease. GeneralPoxter (talk) 01:55, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Edelseider: Just in case you weren't aware: this article now has a Recordings section, which looks like it was added the day after you requested it. You may be able to finalise the review now. RebeccaGreen (talk) 07:43, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
- @RebeccaGreen: – you, and anyone else, could have finalised that review too, I do not own it, do I?
- , and that's all from me. Edelseider (talk) 08:00, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
- Of course, Edelseider, but I am hesitant to complete a review that another editor has started unless they have indicated that they either don't want to complete it themselves, or don't mind, that's why I pinged you. RebeccaGreen (talk) 08:46, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
- Striking ALT1, since Kalinnikov died of tuberculosis rather than recovering from it. BlueMoonset (talk) 18:56, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
- ALT1: