Template:Did you know nominations/Swan Song (song)

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:54, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

Swan Song (song)

(

)

... that Dua Lipa's character transforms into Alita at the end of her "Swan Song" music video? Source:[1]

Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Managing by wire

Created by MaranoFan (talk). Self-nominated at 07:46, 26 January 2019 (UTC).

Is the {{under construction}} template still necessary? Daniel Case (talk) 06:49, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

I have removed the construction tag. I notice that the nominator hasn't edited in almost three weeks. Flibirigit (talk) 14:41, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

Full review needed now that template is gone. BlueMoonset (talk) 16:23, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

@Daniel Case: Now that the under construction template is gone, do you want to do a full review? Thanks, --SkyGazer 512 ^{Oh no, what did I do this time?} 01:02, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

The readable prose count is only 1337, and thus too short to be eligible at this time. If lengthened, I will do the full review. Flibirigit (talk) 04:46, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

Please don't close this nomination. I will have the article expanded within the next 12 hours. Thank you for your patience.--N Ø 10:58, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

Flibirigit, I've expanded it and its now up to 1,549 characters in prose and thus eligible.--N Ø 16:06, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

I will do a review later today. Flibirigit (talk) 16:08, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy compliance:

Adequate sourcing: - ?
Neutral:
Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: Article created on January 24, and nominated within seven days. Readable prose count is now at 1542, therefore long enough. Article is neutral in tone. No plagiarism issues detected. Hook is properly cited and mentioned inline. QPQ completed. The song title should be in italtics through the article, instead of in quotation marks. Last sentence in the "Background" needs a citation. Flibirigit (talk) 18:22, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for the review. I believe we're using the right marks for the song name since italics are used for albums and EPs, not songs, per MOS:NOITALIC. I added the source which you asked for the last sentence in background.--N Ø 18:50, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for the added citation. I apologize for my memory lapse between album/song titles. This looks good to go now. Flibirigit (talk) 21:51, 2 March 2019 (UTC)