Template:Did you know nominations/Sudha Cars Museum
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:55, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Sudha Cars Museum
[edit]- ... that exhibits in the Sudha Cars Museum have found their way to Ripley's Believe It or Not!?
- ALT1:... a tricycle at the Sudha Cars Museum has been featured as the Largest Tricycle in the World in the Guinness World Records?
- Comment: Feel free to take an image. QPQ will follow. Also, please do suggest more interesting hooks, the article is full of them.
Created by Rsrikanth05 (talk) and Dharmadhyaksha (talk). Nominated by Rsrikanth05 (talk) at 18:28, 16 August 2016 (UTC).
- Comment: QPQ done, Don't talk to me or my son ever again. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 18:38, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
No issues found with article, ready for human review.
- ✓ This article is new and was created on 13:43, 09 August 2016 (UTC)
- ✓ This article meets the DYK criteria at 1711 characters
- ✓ All paragraphs in this article have at least one citation
- ✓ This article has no outstanding maintenance tags
- ✓ A copyright violation is unlikely according to automated metrics (2.0% confidence; confirm)
- Note to reviewers: There is low confidence in this automated metric, please manually verify that there is no copyright infringement or close paraphrasing. Note that this number may be inflated due to cited quotes and titles which do not constitute a copyright violation.
- No overall issues detected
- ✓ The hook ALT0 is an appropriate length at 86 characters
- ✓ Rsrikanth05 has more than 5 DYK credits. A QPQ review of Template:Did you know nominations/Don't talk to me or my son ever again was performed for this nomination.
Automatically reviewed by DYKReviewBot. This is not a substitute for a human review. Please report any issues with the bot. --DYKReviewBot (report bugs) 19:07, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
New enough and long enough, inline citations and references checks, factual and interesting hooks, close paraphrasing and neutrality is checked as well and approved, Good work, well done! This one is good to go. An image from the article could be used if needed.BabbaQ (talk) 19:59, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
