The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 21:55, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
Overall: Article's RPS has been expanded 5.7× from 624 B to 3563 B. Article is sourced, and the hook is interesting and cited with Ref 1 in the article. Earwig looks good - all of the would-be concerns are direct quotes and are noted as such in the article. A QPQ has been completed, so I believe we are good to go. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 03:55, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Article's RPS has been expanded 5.7× from 624 B to 3563 B. Article is sourced, and the hook is interesting and cited with Ref 1 in the article. Earwig looks good - all of the would-be concerns are direct quotes and are noted as such in the article. A QPQ has been completed, so I believe we are good to go. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 03:55, 10 May 2022 (UTC)