The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
... that the earliest Latin translation of any part of the Quran is a single verse in the Storia de Mahometh? Source: Wolf 2014, p. 15 n11: "The portion of the Storia dedicated to the Zaynab incident is actually a Latin translation of Qurʾan 33:37, making it the first known Latin translation of any portion of the Qurʾan."
ALT1: ... that while accepting the basic facts of Muhammad's life as given in the Islamic tradition, the Christian Storia de Mahometh gives a negative interpretation of every one? Source: Wolf 2014, p. 15: "the Latin author twisted for polemical effect each and every historical datum that he pilfered from the official account of the Prophet."
good to go with the original hook, Maculosae tegmine lyncis (talk) 07:40, 27 May 2022 (UTC)