Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Shornemead Fort

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:24, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

Shornemead Fort

[edit]

Exterior of Shornemead Fort

  • ... that Shornemead Fort in Kent (pictured) had to be disarmed only 25 years after it was built because subsidence made it unsafe for its guns to be fired?

5x expanded by Prioryman (talk). Self-nominated at 07:33, 7 June 2015 (UTC).

  • Well sourced and illustrated, interesting hook (and article). Length, date and QPQ check out. Nice work, --Al Ameer (talk) 16:25, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
  • No, not initially. But I see that there are more than a few instances of close paraphrasing which should be addressed before this nomination is passed. My apologies to the nominator for not checking more thoroughly. --Al Ameer (talk) 17:00, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
  • I've had another look at the article and I can't see the instances of close paraphrasing which you're referring to but haven't expanded upon. Would you care to give me some pointers? Prioryman (talk) 18:43, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
  • The only notable instance is 14 guns to be mounted on the roof behind a masonry parapret and shields with 2 pivot guns and 20 other guns which is a bit too close to the source. Some other instances turned out to be fine like "Royal Commission on the Defence of the United Kingdom" which are official names/phrases. Otherwise, there are a couple minor instances listed here [1]. Other than that it's AGF for the offline sources and it's good to go unless Yoninah sees something I don't see. --Al Ameer (talk) 20:24, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
  • OK, thanks. I've made some changes - hopefully this will resolve the issue. Prioryman (talk) 11:43, 9 June 2015 (UTC)