Template:Did you know nominations/Security Consultancy Wing
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 10:02, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Security Consultancy Wing
- ... that a prison break by suspected terrorists led to the Government of Madhya Pradesh requesting the Central Industrial Security Force to review the security of its jails? Bhopal jailbreak: Madhya Pradesh government asks CISF to audit three more prisons
- ALT1:... that several schools in India approached the Central Industrial Security Force for security audits after a child was murdered in a school? Schools ask CISF to conduct security audit of premises
- Reviewed: Not required as I only have 4 DYK credits to my account
Created by Deepak G Goswami (talk). Self-nominated at 09:54, 25 May 2020 (UTC).
- Created on 23 May and nominated within time. Copyvio seems to checkout. Length and general neutrality etc seems to check out as far as the article is concerned.
- There is a line in the article - the first line under "Services" header - "The Central Industrial Security Force is the only Government of India approved security consultancy body in India." Both of the citations listed for this paragraph do not say this. Please can you confirm which source you have used for this line.
- Hooks are present in the article and properly referenced. I added "a" in ALT0; and "in India" to ALT1 for clarity. However, the hook has CISF linking to the dyk article. This is a little surprising even though I think I get the intention behind it. Maybe use CISF Security Consultancy Wing or even just Security Consultancy Wing. Or if you think it is fine leave it. It does make sense how you are using CISF and the security consultancy wing interchangeably in some places.
DTM (talk) 05:27, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you for your thorough review. I have provided an in-line citation for that sentence which I don't know how did I miss. "Security Consultancy Wing" is not a well-known name and every source uses "CISF" more predominantly and this is the reason why I have also used the name of parent organisation. Regards.--Deepak G Goswami (talk) 08:37, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
