Template:Did you know nominations/Scarlet Memorial: Tales of Cannibalism in Modern China
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:45, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Scarlet Memorial: Tales of Cannibalism in Modern China
[edit]- ... that the 1993 book Scarlet Memorial: Tales of Cannibalism in Modern China alleges that victors in a factional battle ate the flesh of losers in Guangxi in China's Cultural Revolution?
Created/expanded by CWH (talk). Self-nominated at 18:55, 5 September 2016 (UTC).
• 
No issues found with article, ready for human review.
- ✓ This article is new and was created on 02:22, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
- ✓ This article meets the DYK criteria at 8995 characters
- ✓ All paragraphs in this article have at least one citation
- ✓ This article has no outstanding maintenance tags
- ? A copyright violation is suspected by an automated tool, with 43.2% confidence. (confirm)
- Note to reviewers: There is low confidence in this automated metric, please manually verify that there is no copyright infringement or close paraphrasing. Note that this number may be inflated due to cited quotes and titles which do not constitute a copyright violation.
• 
Some overall issues detected
- ✓ The hook ALT0 is an appropriate length at 181 characters
- ✗ CWH has more than 5 DYK credits. A QPQ review is required for this nomination.
- DYK review of Iris cedretii now complete.ch (talk) 16:46, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
Automatically reviewed by DYKReviewBot. This is not a substitute for a human review. Please report any issues with the bot. --DYKReviewBot (report bugs) 03:27, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
- Article (New):
- Article (Long enough):
- Article (Within policy): The copyright violation % is so high because of the quotes used. Fair use. Meanwhile, article is written neutrally.
- Hook (Format):
- Hook (Content):
- QPQ:
Requires QPQ - Images: One image - fair use.
- Article (New):
Overall, Pass! 
--Coin945 (talk) 16:32, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
outstanding QPQ review.--Coin945 (talk) 04:47, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Coin945, if a QPQ is required but hasn't been supplied, the nomination cannot be passed. Further, if there are issues with the hook content, then nomination also cannot be passed. I think it would be helpful if instead of using icons, which are only supposed to be used once in a review as an overall grade, that you simply say how the article or hook meets or fails to meet each particular DYK criterion. Also, if you'll note, a manual verification is supposed to be made of copyvio, and needs to be made for close paraphrasing since the automated copyvio tool is generally not capable of finding close paraphrasing; reviews should mention that neutrality of article and hook and article copyvio has been checked. Thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 03:13, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- BlueMoonset as noted, the QPQ is satisfied and Coin945 found that the violation % was high because of the quotes used. ch (talk) 04:16, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Whoops I made a mistake with my icons. Hook content is actually fine. I'll fix up my icons and comments above.--Coin945 (talk) 04:47, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- @CWH: An additional comment I would make is that the article is currently not in Headings that are used throughout Wikipedia for books. I would highly recommend turning "Zheng Yi" into "Background", and splitting "Scarlet Memorial" into something like "Research", "Development", and "Release" (perhaps you need more development and release information?), and then turn "Reception in the West" to Critical reception, which subsections on "West" and "East".--Coin945 (talk) 04:47, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Coin945, thanks for your thoughful and practical observations, which once again show the importance of a cool outside eye. I will continue the discussion on the article's TalkPage, where it will be more available to other editors than this transclusion. I had reasons for making the usual Background section into Zheng Yi, though on reconsideration they may not be dispositive.ch (talk) 17:24, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- @CWH: An additional comment I would make is that the article is currently not in Headings that are used throughout Wikipedia for books. I would highly recommend turning "Zheng Yi" into "Background", and splitting "Scarlet Memorial" into something like "Research", "Development", and "Release" (perhaps you need more development and release information?), and then turn "Reception in the West" to Critical reception, which subsections on "West" and "East".--Coin945 (talk) 04:47, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Whoops I made a mistake with my icons. Hook content is actually fine. I'll fix up my icons and comments above.--Coin945 (talk) 04:47, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Comment: QPQ review: -- as noted above, I did the review for Iris cedretii (it is not required that the nomination be successful or that the process to be finished in order to get credit). In any case, I have also finished Chen Mingxia. ch (talk) 17:33, 15 September 2016 (UTC)