Template:Did you know nominations/Salvatore Pais

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 22:14, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

Salvatore Pais

(

)

Salvatore Pais's design for the U.S. Navy

... ~~that Salvatore Pais's design for a "UFO-like aircraft that uses 'anti-gravity' technology" (pictured) has been patented by the U.S. Navy? (Forbes)~~
- ALT1:... that Salvatore Pais's design for a "hybrid aerospace/undersea craft" (pictured) has been patented by the U.S. Navy? (patent)

Reviewed: Wildlife of Christmas Island
Comment: Plenty of alternative hooks possible here

Created by Philafrenzy (talk) and Whispyhistory (talk). Nominated by Philafrenzy (talk) at 21:48, 13 December 2019 (UTC).

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy compliance:

Adequate sourcing: - Forbes contributors are not reliable sources (see WP:RS/P)
Neutral:
Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook eligibility:

Cited: - Struck first hook because this is not an RS
Interesting:

Image eligibility:

Freely licensed:
Used in article:
Clear at 100px: - I can't read the chart at this resolution.

QPQ: - TBD
Overall: Notability not evaluated. Second hook ok without picture. Please do not move DYK nom subpages, it leads to unexpected results (if you click the review link, you will see what I mean) b uidhe 22:36, 13 December 2019 (UTC)

Thanks, the image is simply there to provide a general impression of one of the possible shapes of the craft. Why isn't the picture suitable for the second hook? It is the thing mentioned in the hook. Forbes source removed from article. QPQ shortly. Philafrenzy (talk) 23:19, 13 December 2019 (UTC)

Here are a couple of Alts (2nd pic relates to Alt 3):

- ALT2:... that Salvatore Pais's design for an electromagnetic field generator to deflect asteroids away from the Earth has been patented by the U.S. Navy?
- ALT3:... that Salvatore Pais's design for a compact nuclear fusion reactor has been patented by the U.S. Navy? Philafrenzy (talk) 09:49, 15 December 2019 (UTC)

Giving this a fresh review as it's been some time and there have been over 50 edits to the page since being nominated:

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
Freely licensed: Used in article: Clear at 100px:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: Previous issues have been addressed. This article is good to go. Prefer ALT2 over others, personally find it most interesting. ~riley (talk) 21:39, 25 December 2019 (UTC)

@Philafrenzy:@~riley: I came by to promote this with an image. I'm willing to run ALT2 in a quirky slot, but I don't see mention of the U.S. Navy patent in the text. Yoninah (talk) 21:58, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

Done and see ref 8. Philafrenzy (talk) 22:07, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

Thanks. Yoninah (talk) 22:13, 7 January 2020 (UTC)