Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/S 9 (Abydos)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:05, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

S 9 (Abydos)

[edit]
  • ... that Egyptian tomb S9 suffered deliberate, extensive, state-sanctioned stone and grave robbing? Sources: McCormack, Dawn (2006). "Borrowed Legacy, Royal Tombs S9 and S10 at South Abydos" Expedition. 48 (2), p. 26; Wegner, Josef W. (2015). "A royal necropolis at south Abydos: New Light on Egypt's Second Intermediate Period". Near Eastern Archaeology. 78 (2), p. 71; Dodson, Aidan (2016). The Royal Tombs of Ancient Egypt. Barnsley Pen and Sword Archaeology. ISBN 978-1-47-382159-0, pp. 57-58
    • ALT1:... that Egyptian tomb S9 is located beneath the Mountain of Anubis? Source: Wegner, Josef W. (2015). "A royal necropolis at south Abydos: New Light on Egypt's Second Intermediate Period". Near Eastern Archaeology. 78 (2), p. 69; Ayrton, Edward R.; Weigall, Arthur; Petrie, Flinders (1904). Abydos: Part III: 1904. Egypt exploration fund. 25. London. OCLC 474028932, p. 13.

Created by Iry-Hor (talk). Self-nominated at 13:04, 18 August 2017 (UTC).

  • @Iry-Hor: New, long enough, sourced, hook checks out (one source online, other accepted AGF). It looks like this is your sixth DYK, so you need a QPQ and then this is set. (Added "Egyptian" before "tomb S9" for clarity.) --Usernameunique (talk) 12:29, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
Usernameunique Sorry for the delay, I was on vacations. Iry-Hor (talk) 16:18, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
Usernameunique that is it I have reviewed the DYK candidate Amelia Earhart: The Lost Evidence. Let me know if this is now ok for the S 9 article. Iry-Hor (talk) 07:44, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
Looks good, thanks!Usernameunique