Template:Did you know nominations/Russian language in the United States
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by BlueMoonset (talk) 08:10, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
Russian language in the United States
[edit]- ... that most Russian-speakers in the United States are Jewish immigrants from the former Soviet Union?
- Reviewed: List of universities in Venezuela
Created/expanded by Yerevanci (talk). Self nom at 03:25, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
- Hooks seems to be covered by this: "Jews constitute about 80% of all immigrants from the former Soviet states." but I am not 100% sure. I left a note to the nominator. — ΛΧΣ21™ 10:49, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
- Yes, it is. What's the problem with that? That seems to be the most interesting sentence of the article, so I decided to make it the hook.--Երևանցի ասելիք կա՞ 14:09, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
- There is no problem. I just needed to verify thet it truly was it, because the wording on the article leads to confusion when compared to the hook (but it's a personal opinion). So, it is Good to go for me. — ΛΧΣ21™ 18:45, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
- People from Soviet states are different from Russian speakers. If that is your reference it doesn't defend your hook. Secretlondon (talk) 21:24, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
- Where did I say that they are the same? Instead of saying "most Russian-speakers in the United States are Jewish immigrants from Russia, Ukraine and Belarus", the hook says "the former Soviet Union". What's the problem with that? --Երևանցի ասելիք կա՞ 00:32, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
- People from Soviet states are different from Russian speakers. If that is your reference it doesn't defend your hook. Secretlondon (talk) 21:24, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
- There is no problem. I just needed to verify thet it truly was it, because the wording on the article leads to confusion when compared to the hook (but it's a personal opinion). So, it is Good to go for me. — ΛΧΣ21™ 18:45, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
- Yes, it is. What's the problem with that? That seems to be the most interesting sentence of the article, so I decided to make it the hook.--Երևանցի ասելիք կա՞ 14:09, 27 October 2012 (UTC)