Template:Did you know nominations/Rue du Tapis-Vert

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:14, 8 December 2018 (UTC)

Rue du Tapis-Vert

(

)

... that in 1794, a silver statue of the Virgin Mary from the chapel at Notre-Dame de la Garde was melted down at the mint of Marseille located on Rue du Tapis-Vert?
- ALT1:~~... that during the French Revolution, the Catholic Église de la Mission de France church on Rue du Tapis-Vert was used by Protestants?~~
- ALT2:~~... that Rue du Tapis-Vert, Marseille contains a Monument historique church?~~

Reviewed: Bob Jones
Comment: Translated from French articles, but still eligible as per 1e of the eligibility criteria

Created/expanded by Joseph2302 (talk). Self-nominated at 17:58, 17 October 2018 (UTC).

This article is new enough and long enough. Approving the original hook as being the most interesting. The hook facts are sourced inline, the article is neutral and I detected no copyright or close paraphrasing issues. A QPQ has been done. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:03, 22 November 2018 (UTC)

Reopened after promotion. See WT:Did you know/Archive 154#Machine translation in Prep 3 moved to draft. MANdARAX • XAЯAbИAM 21:15, 29 November 2018 (UTC)

Fram, since you're the one who moved the article to Draftspace, I wanted to be sure your issues had been dealt with prior to it being repromoted. Are their still issues, or may this proceed? BlueMoonset (talk) 05:05, 3 December 2018 (UTC)

While I don't believe the explanation for the error, the issue seems to have been resolved now, and I guess the hook can now be properly reviewed (since I doubt that such a review happened with the wrong title and author for the source for the hook, despite the tick it received). Fram (talk) 06:48, 3 December 2018 (UTC)

New reviewer needed. Joseph2302 (talk) 18:53, 3 December 2018 (UTC)

- Length, Date, QPQ, and Earwigs check. Foriegn language ref accepted AGF. Restoring the tick for the original hook. Best, Mifter (talk) 00:47, 7 December 2018 (UTC)