Template:Did you know nominations/Roman Neumayer
Appearance
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by 97198 (talk) 01:50, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Roman Neumayer
[edit]- ... that German Ice Hockey Hall of Fame inductee Roman Neumayer assisted in founding the first ice hockey team in Namibia? in Germanin English (behind firewall)
- Reviewed: Sumiko Hennessy & Asian Pacific Development Center (1st of 2 credits)
Created by Flibirigit (talk). Self-nominated at 15:38, 17 June 2019 (UTC).
- Article meets requirements, hook is interesting to a broad audience, free of close paraphrasing, QPQ done. @Flibirigit: The only issue is that the reference supporting the hook fact is not at the actual sentence supporting it, but in the sentence that comes after. Please duplicate the reference, and this will be good to go. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 02:14, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
- Narutolovehinata5 I have combined the two sentences into one statement supported by the two above citations. Flibirigit (talk) 02:22, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks. However, now the paragraph is now a single very long sentence; I don't think combining them was a good idea, either revert to the previous version with the reference in the correct position, or rewrite the paragraph so as to not make it so long. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 02:24, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
- The sentence is fine as is, and adheres to DYK policy. Flibirigit (talk) 14:14, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
- It's not that it doesn't follow policy, but rather that the sentence doesn't read well. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 04:42, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
- We agree to disagree on this. Another opinion is requested. Flibirigit (talk) 16:19, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
- Looked. Please split that sentence in three, and apply the sources ;) - ping me when done, I'll review. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:37, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
- @Gerda Arendt: The paragraph was split up. The hook is supported by the citations at the end of the first sentence. The final two sentences are supported by the citations at the end of the paragraph. Flibirigit (talk) 20:28, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
- Fine, thank you. I suggest you reword the hook with his name first, but approve also as is. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:33, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
- @Gerda Arendt: The paragraph was split up. The hook is supported by the citations at the end of the first sentence. The final two sentences are supported by the citations at the end of the paragraph. Flibirigit (talk) 20:28, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
- Looked. Please split that sentence in three, and apply the sources ;) - ping me when done, I'll review. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:37, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
- We agree to disagree on this. Another opinion is requested. Flibirigit (talk) 16:19, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
- It's not that it doesn't follow policy, but rather that the sentence doesn't read well. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 04:42, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
- The sentence is fine as is, and adheres to DYK policy. Flibirigit (talk) 14:14, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks. However, now the paragraph is now a single very long sentence; I don't think combining them was a good idea, either revert to the previous version with the reference in the correct position, or rewrite the paragraph so as to not make it so long. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 02:24, 21 June 2019 (UTC)