Template:Did you know nominations/Richard J. Scott
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:14, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Richard J. Scott
[edit]- ... that before he was Chief Justice of Manitoba, Richard J. Scott served as the trial judge in R v Lavallee, a case which granted legal recognition to battered woman syndrome as a defence?
- Comment: It's my first time submitting to DYK – let me know what you think!
Created by Graham11 (talk). Self-nominated at 02:55, 26 August 2016 (UTC).
No issues found with article, ready for human review.
- ✓ This article is new and was created on 02:51, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
- ✓ This article meets the DYK criteria at 4404 characters
- ✓ All paragraphs in this article have at least one citation
- ✓ This article has no outstanding maintenance tags
- ? A copyright violation is suspected by an automated tool, with 50.7% confidence. (confirm)
- Note to reviewers: There is low confidence in this automated metric, please manually verify that there is no copyright infringement or close paraphrasing. Note that this number may be inflated due to cited quotes and titles which do not constitute a copyright violation.
- No overall issues detected
- ✓ The hook ALT0 is an appropriate length at 181 characters
- ✓ Graham11 has fewer than 5 DYK credits. No QPQ required. Note a QPQ will be required after 5 more DYKs.
Automatically reviewed by DYKReviewBot. This is not a substitute for a human review. Please report any issues with the bot. --DYKReviewBot (report bugs) 04:10, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
- I'll be the human to review this. The sections which the bot thought were copyvios are quotes, so they're fine. QPQ not required, article length is fine and it was made recently. I suggest you wikilink R v Lavallee in the hook as people may not know what that is.
Anarchyte (work | talk) 07:57, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
- I'll be the human to review this. The sections which the bot thought were copyvios are quotes, so they're fine. QPQ not required, article length is fine and it was made recently. I suggest you wikilink R v Lavallee in the hook as people may not know what that is.
