Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Rathika Ramasamy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Montanabw(talk) 01:36, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

Rathika Ramasamy

[edit]
Red-wattled lapwing (Vanellus indicus)
Red-wattled lapwing (Vanellus indicus)
  • ... that Rathika Ramasamy's photo collection of birds (one pictured) were published in 2009 in ‘Uccelli in Natura’, an Italian bird magazine, and she was called the best bird photographer from Asia?

Created by Nvvchar (talk). Self-nominated at 09:09, 5 May 2016 (UTC).

  • The article is new: Green tickY
  • The article is long enough: Green tickY
  • The hook is interesting: Green tickY
  • Please put the source at the end of the hook in the text.
  • The hook is below 200 characters: Green tickY
  • Copyvio detector does not reveal any copyright violation: Green tickY
  • QPQ: Green tickY
  • Copy right of picture: Green tickY

Saff V. (talk) 12:47, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

  • Thanks for the review. Ref fixed at the end of the hook text in the article.Nvvchar. 15:19, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
  • @Nvvchar: The fourth source is self-publish. Please replace with another source.Saff V. (talk) 06:03, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Saff V. Yes, I have deleted the book self-publish reference and added another ref to the text with slight modifications.Nvvchar. 12:43, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
  • @Nvvchar: The last issue I see here is orphan. Please link the article to other articles.Saff V. (talk) 04:19, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Thanks. Good to go.Saff V. (talk) 07:25, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

New reviewer needed, as the article has been reworked. Shortly after this was promoted to Prep, numerous edits on the article by more than one person completely removed the hook wording out of the article, and pretty much re-wrote the article. Nvvchar Please re-check the article and see if you can come up with another hook. I am very sorry this happened to your hook. — Maile (talk) 23:05, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

  • Saff V. Can you please consider reviewing the new hook?Nvvchar. 15:33, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Given the extent of the rewrite, a full re-review will be necessary, not just of the proposed ALT1 hook. BlueMoonset (talk) 03:37, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
  • This article is new enough and long enough. The ALT1 hook facts are sourced inline, the image is appropriately licensed, the article is neutral and I detected no copyright issues. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:23, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
  • The inline cite for ALT1 says nothing about "in particular of birds". Yoninah (talk) 22:02, 21 May 2016 (UTC)hook with ALT
  • Yoninah Yes. I have now reworded the ALT1 hook with this ALT2 hook. I hope it is acceptable. Thanks.Nvvchar. 04:24, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

ALT2... that Rathika Ramasamy', wildlife photographer specialized in bird photography (one pictured), took part at the "Clean Ganga Campaign" held in September 2005 at the India International Centre?

Instead of introducing more errors into the hook, I suggest we go with ALT1a
  • Good idea, @Cwmhiraeth:. ALT1a hook ref verified and cited inline. Image is freely licensed. ALT1a good to go. Yoninah (talk) 10:22, 22 May 2016 (UTC)