The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 23:09, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
... that the defendants in the Racism-Turanism trials between 1944 and 1947 were absolved because racism wasn't contrary to the Turkish constitution? Source: Umut Uzer, An intellectual History of Turkish Nationalism pp.160-161 / the new court acquitted all the defendants on March 1947 / The Court also referred to the Settlement Law, which differentiated between those belonging to the Turkish race and those who do not belong to the Turkish race. Thus racism was not unconstitutional
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: - Offline/paywalled citation accepted in good faith
Interesting:
QPQ: Done.
Overall: Article is new enough, long enough and sourced. Qpq has been provided, and Earwig gives low plagiarism. It is very well referenced, unfortunately most sources are not accessible, then AGF. The only hook is cited in the article and interesting. There is no picture. Good to go! Alex2006 (talk) 16:42, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
Article is new enough, long enough and sourced. Qpq has been provided, and Earwig gives low plagiarism. It is very well referenced, unfortunately most sources are not accessible, then AGF. The only hook is cited in the article and interesting. There is no picture. Good to go! Alex2006 (talk) 16:42, 17 September 2021 (UTC)