Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Pulpit Freedom Sunday

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:20, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

Pulpit Freedom Sunday

[edit]
  • ... that Pulpit Freedom Sunday is an act of civil disobedience pitting pastors against the Internal Revenue Service? Source: "The Pulpit Freedom Campaign has amassed the pastors to cooperate in a mass violation of a 1954 law" [1]

Created by Lionelt (talk). Self-nominated at 08:14, 6 February 2018 (UTC).

  • DYK checklist template
General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
QPQ: Done.

Overall: All criteria are met for DYK usage. Congratulations!Georgejdorner (talk) 19:09, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

  • I have pulled this from prep 4 mainly because the last reference to refer to this day is from 2014 so it isn't clear this day of protest is still extant. Also, one of the sources states that pastors talk about which candidate's policies are more biblical, which isn't quite the same thing as endorsing a given candidate. So I think this nomination needs more work. Gatoclass (talk) 15:03, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
  • @Gatoclass: 1) Last year the annual event took place on 10/2/17 [2]. 2) What difference does it make if ONE source comments about biblical policies? Does this specifically fall under the DYK criteria or is this best handled by editors during the normal course of editing? – Lionel(talk) 23:01, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
Lionel, I'm trying to ensure your nomination doesn't get yanked from the main page after five minutes, okay? Regarding the source you mention, that looks fine, but it isn't in the article. Gatoclass (talk) 11:32, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
  • Understood @Gatoclass: thanks :-) I found a better ref and added New York Magazine dated 11/2/17 which states that the event is current. See ref #4. – Lionel(talk) 12:52, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

Thanks Lionelt, but I still think the hook isn't quite accurate, in which case I will propose the following alt:

I added something to the article to cover the hook. If you are happy with the ALT, we can take it from there. Gatoclass (talk) 11:30, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

  • It looks great. Thanks for going beyond the call of duty. You're the best.– Lionel(talk) 11:42, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
Thanks, the only problem is I can't approve my own hook so I'll have to ask somebody else to do it. Georgejdorner, would you mind verifying ALT1 please? Gatoclass (talk) 13:34, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
ALT1 is not only good to go, it seems to me to be even punchier than the original hook.Georgejdorner (talk) 17:10, 23 February 2018 (UTC)