The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 15:22, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Created by Hog Farm (talk). Self-nominated at 18:54, 31 October 2020 (UTC).
I am not really sure either hook works for DYK. The first one is not particularly unusual or interesting to someone who wasn't already interested in the book. The second one is likely to be appreciated only by those who already have a good grasp of Civil War history and know, for instance, what Price's Raid is and why it is significant. DYK definitely works well for some books but not all of them, depending on the subject matter. (t · c) buidhe 09:17, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
This hook is definitely promising, but the hook makes it sound single-handed while the cited source actually says "helped to debunk". How about the following variation:
I am not really sure either hook works for DYK. The first one is not particularly unusual or interesting to someone who wasn't already interested in the book. The second one is likely to be appreciated only by those who already have a good grasp of Civil War history and know, for instance, what Price's Raid is and why it is significant. DYK definitely works well for some books but not all of them, depending on the subject matter. (t · c) buidhe 09:17, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
Article approved; new reviewer needed to approve ALT2b only. (t · c) buidhe 22:59, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
Approving ALT2b, and otherwise relying on Buidhe's review. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:42, 2 November 2020 (UTC)