Template:Did you know nominations/Poulton's Match
Appearance
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Miyagawa (talk) 10:21, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Poulton's Match
[edit]- ... that Frank Tarr broke his collarbone, Freddie Turner damaged his knee, and George Cunningham was concussed in the 1909 Varsity Match?
- ALT1:... that the 1909 Varsity Match came to be known as Poulton's Match after Ronnie Poulton scored a record five tries?
- Reviewed: Felicity Aston
Created by FunkyCanute (talk). Self-nominated at 14:47, 22 June 2016 (UTC).
No issues found.
- ✓ This article is new and was created on 16:46, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
- ✓ This article meets the DYK criteria at 3705 characters
- ✓ All paragraphs in this article have at least one citation
✗ This article has the following issues:{{Infobox football match}}
from 11 December 1909Bot error, fix committed. Intelligentsium 23:48, 23 June 2016 (UTC){{rugbybox}}
from 11 December 1909
- ✓ The probability of copyright violation is 2.9%. (confirm)
- Note to reviewers: There is low confidence in this automated metric, please manually verify that there is no copyright infringement or close paraphrasing. Note that this number may be inflated due to cited quotes and titles which do not constitute a copyright violation.
- ✓ The probability of copyright violation is 2.9%. (confirm)
- ✓ The hook ALT0 is an appropriate length at 138 characters
- ✓ This is FunkyCanute's 45th nomination. A QPQ review of Template:Did you know nominations/Felicity Aston was performed for this nomination.
Automatically reviewed by DYKReviewBot. This bot is experimental; please report any issues. This is not a substitute for a human review. --DYKReviewBot (report bugs) 23:45, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
This article is new enough and long enough. The Carson book was available online so I was able to add extra citations to cover the hook facts, and either hook could be used. The article is neutral and I found no copyvios. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:43, 26 June 2016 (UTC)