Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Positioning theory

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Amkgp (talk) 20:32, 11 December 2020 (UTC)

DYK toolbox

Positioning theory

(
)
  • ... that in positioning theory, positions are fluid, while in role theory, roles are fixed? (Biddle et al., 1986)
* Reviewed: exempt as first ever nomination, wish to understand the process prior to attempting a review.

Created/expanded by Itsjessjj (talk). Self-nominated at 03:19, 4 December 2020 (UTC).

  • ALT1 ... that in positioning theory, social positions are fluid; while in role theory, social roles are fixed? (Biddle et al., 1986)

*ALT2 ... that in positioning theory, positions, speech, and actions are fluid; while in role theory, roles are fixed and long lasting? (Harré, R., 2015) *ALT3 ... that in positioning theory, positions of individuals are fluid where their perceptions of interactions with others can change, which is in contrast to role theory, where roles are seen as responsibilities of individuals that do not change? (Harré, R., 2015)

  • ALT4 ... that in positioning theory, positions are defined as a persons rights, duties, and obligations which are fluid in various social contexts; as opposed to fixed and long lasting roles? (Harré, Rom; Moghaddam, F. M (2003)
  • Reviewed: exempt as first ever nomination, wish to understand the process prior to attempting a review.

Created/expanded by Itsjessjj (talk). Self-nominated at 03:19, 4 December 2020 (UTC).

  • information Note: Nominator is a WikiEd student editor
  • information Note: Nominator is a WikiEd student editor for the Fall 2020 term at UCLA. (course link) The course ends on December 15, 2020. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 09:56, 5 December 2020 (UTC)


General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
  • Cited: Yes - Offline/paywalled citation accepted in good faith
  • Interesting: Yes
QPQ: None required.

Overall: NOTES: QPQ exempt; passes eligibility, sourcing, and earwig – NOTE: each paragraph in the article should end with a reference; I corrected DYK formatting issue(s) (above); No Image or policy problems; there are, however, Hook and Interest issues, problems that go hand-in-hand together (see above). Article itself is well-developed and solid "C" class; contains graphic(s). GenQuest "scribble" 18:01, 5 December 2020 (UTC)

  • Comment: Thank you Narutolovehinata5 and GenQuest ! I rewrote and condensed AL2. I also went back and cited at the end of each paragraph of my wikipage on Positioning theory. Please let me know if there are any other issues I should address. itsjessjj (talk) 08:11, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
  • itsjessjj, I put up a second "ALT1"; if it makes sense and you're OK with it, ping me and I'll approve for a second pair of eyes to take a look at your nom. Regards, GenQuest "scribble" 02:12, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
  • GenQuest, Thank you so much for taking the time to edit and consider this nomination. I appreciate the change to the hook but I want to be careful when using the word "social position" because social position refers to the position of an individual in a given society and culture, however position in positioning theory has a deeper meaning than just this. It is also looking at the narrative of the individual and the experiences that they have had. In most articles I have read comparing positioning theory to role theory, they do not use the term "social position" and "social role". Because of this, I'm not sure if that is the right phrasing to use. I also changed the citation because the citation I originally used focused more on role theory but the new citation describes the differences between both role theory and positioning theory. I tried to also add in a bit more wording to make the hook more specific but please let me know if I still need to change anything or maybe keep it simple like I did before. I listed all of this under ALT2. Thank you again. itsjessjj 04:56, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
  • itsjessjj Ok, noted your concerns and struck my suggestion. Also, the important citation used for your hook is the one that's in the article (not the one here), so that's good. You can also continue working on the article through this process if you need to or want to. Now, with that said, the possible problem I see with ALT2: I think the average reader may need a better definition/understanding of the use of the word "position" as used in the hook, as there are few contextual clues in a short Hook-like statement. Any suggestions? GenQuest "scribble" 12:21, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
  • GenQuest Thank you for your suggestion. I agree that positioning needs more context clues for the average reader to have a better understanding. I changed the hook again and tried to add some more detail. Originally I wanted to write "in positioning theory, positions of individuals are fluid. The way one perceives the moment-by-moment interactions they have with others can change depending on the storylines and narratives of themselves and those they interact with as well as their rights and duties. In contrast, role theory discusses roles as being fixed. Roles are seen as responsibilities of individuals that do not change", but I felt like this was too long so I tried to condense it in ALT3. A role is something you can write down about a person like their obligation or responsibility to teach a class but the position is how a person perceives the power they have or don't have to affect change. The way someone acts and talks is in relationship to what they perceive as their rights and duties. I hope that makes sense. Please let me know if I need to change the wording, add more detail or condense the hook. I appreciate all of your input. Thank you so much. itsjessjj 12:56, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
  • itsjessjj: I'd like to put this one to bed. Check out the new ALT4 and let me know if that is acceptable. GenQuest "scribble" 18:38, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
  • GenQuest ALT4 is perfect! Thank you so much. I really appreciate it. itsjessjj 06:44, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Template:Did_you_know_nominations/Positioning_theory&oldid=993663519"