Template:Did you know nominations/Poralia
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: by Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 00:10, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Poralia, Discomedusae
[edit]( Back to T:TDYK )
( Article history links: )
- ... that Poralia rufescens, a deepwater discomedusan jellyfish, is so lacking in nutritional value that the leatherback sea turtle feeds only on its gonads and tentacles?
- Reviewed: Yellow Sand Society
- Comment: Also reviewed Template:Did you know nominations/List of rulers of Liptako
5x expanded by Cwmhiraeth (talk). Self-nominated at 05:54, 24 May 2018 (UTC).
- "Poralia rufescens, a deepwater discomedusan jellyfish, is so lacking in nutritional value that the leatherback sea turtle "feeds only on its gonads and tentacles'"?
- Members of the order Rhizostomae are collectively known as "root-mouth jellies" and are very diverse. They do not have tentacles ??
- What are gonads? Why is such a word not linked?
- @Tisquesusa: This jellyfish is in the order Semaeostomeae, which does have tentacles at the edge of the bell, not the order Rhizostomae which does not. I have wikilinked gonads in the hook for you. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:53, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
- Yes, thanks. I see the confusion now, the link "discomedusan jellyfish" brings me to "Discomedusae" and there it speaks of "Rhizostomae". Maybe better to link to Semaestomae directly? And the gonad article needs some work, great to have that trigger now. Cheers, Tisquesusa (talk) 14:29, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
- The link goes to Discomedusae because that is the second of the two articles I have expanded and nominated in this hook. The article gonad I only linked because you asked me to do so, and I agree that it is in need of improvement. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 17:13, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
Full review needed of both articles. BlueMoonset (talk) 06:05, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
- Both articles were sufficiently expanded, in time for nomination, QPQ satisfied for the two articles, hook is short enough and seems interesting enough, images correctly licensed, cites sources.
- Issues:
- In Poralia, Capone 2008, it doesn't seem to clearly indicate that the turtles are feeding on Poralia, or if they are, that they feed this way on many jellyfish species.
- In Discomedusae, "a large surface area of [missing word?] with which" - seems to be missing a word after "of"
- I still need to spot check the other sources. Chris857 (talk) 20:34, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
- I agree that the observation on eating gonads and tentacles does not necessarily refer to Poralia, although because it has such a low nutritional value, it probably does. Perhaps we need a different hook. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:04, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Given the issues raised with the hook, this doesn't need a new reviewer at the moment, but that new hook Cwmhiraeth alluded to. Chris857, have you completed those spot checks yet? BlueMoonset (talk) 04:19, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
- @Chris857: It's difficult to tie in the leatherback turtles, so how about ALT2? Cwmhiraeth (talk) 08:56, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
- ALT2 ... that Poralia rufescens, a deepwater discomedusan jellyfish, is so fragile that most specimens brought to the surface are damaged?
- I had a chance to go through the rest of the sources...
- Poralia is good to go, AGF on offline sources.
- In Discomedusae, is the phylogeny section missing Phacellophoridae within Order Semaeostomeae?
- Hook is good to go.
- Chris857 (talk) 03:45, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
- @Chris857: Thank you. I have added Phacellophoridae. That section was already in the article when I started expanding it, and I didn't check to see if it was correct. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:33, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
- I agree that the observation on eating gonads and tentacles does not necessarily refer to Poralia, although because it has such a low nutritional value, it probably does. Perhaps we need a different hook. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:04, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
