Template:Did you know nominations/Planetary Missions Program Office
Appearance
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 21:06, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Planetary Missions Program Office
[edit]![New Horizons, a NASA PMPO mission](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/fc/PIA22190-NewHorizonEncountersAsteroid-2014MU69-ArtistConcept-20180104_%28cropped%29.jpg/120px-PIA22190-NewHorizonEncountersAsteroid-2014MU69-ArtistConcept-20180104_%28cropped%29.jpg)
New Horizons, a NASA PMPO mission
- ... that the Planetary Missions Program Office (PMPO) at NASA manages three of the agency's solar system exploration programs (one of its missions pictured)? Source: official website
- Reviewed:
Sonic Gems Collectionand Speed skating at the 1924 Winter Olympics – Men's 500 metres - Comment: New Horizons chosen as the subject of the illustration, as its article is the most viewed of all the articles for PMPO missions.
- Reviewed:
Moved into mainspace by PhilipTerryGraham (talk). Self-nominated at 14:11, 28 February 2018 (UTC).
The article was published February 26, well-sourced, and interesting. Looks good to go! ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 17:02, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
@Hurricanehink: you should provide a review that explicitly confirms that the five main DYK criteria have been met. A convenient Reviewer's Template is located above the edit window. BTW, the QPQ is incomplete, lacking a review of most of the DYK criteria. Yoninah (talk) 01:19, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
- New?
- Long enough?
- Citation cited?
- Neutral/verifiable?
- QPQ?
- Is the review fine now @Yoninah:? ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 17:01, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
- @Hurricanehink: Yes! Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 18:13, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
Only one QPQ is needed for this nomination, but neither of the two reviews provided are sufficient per QPQ rules. The nominator has apparently abandoned the review for Sonic Gems Collection. The review of Speed skating at the 1924 Winter Olympics – Men's 500 metres is insufficient. Yoninah (talk) 16:06, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
- @Yoninah: Speed skating at the 1924 Winter Olympics – Men's 500 metres has now been adequately reviewed. – PhilipTerryGraham (talk · articles · reviews) 16:29, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
- The image is not eligible for use because it does not appear in the article. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:55, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
- @Cwmhiraeth: The image has been swapped out for one that does appear in the article. – PhilipTerryGraham (talk · articles · reviews) 10:39, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
- Thank you, the new image is in the public domain and does qualify. @Yoninah: If you are happy with the QPQ, could you replace the tick? Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:47, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
- @Cwmhiraeth: The image has been swapped out for one that does appear in the article. – PhilipTerryGraham (talk · articles · reviews) 10:39, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
- The image is not eligible for use because it does not appear in the article. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:55, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
- @Yoninah: Speed skating at the 1924 Winter Olympics – Men's 500 metres has now been adequately reviewed. – PhilipTerryGraham (talk · articles · reviews) 16:29, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
- New?