Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Pandemonium architecture

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Carabinieri (talk) 09:53, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

Pandemonium architecture

[edit]
  • ... that the pandemonium in a pandemonium architecture simply represents the cumulative yelling of the "demons" within the system?

Created/expanded by Jimmierock (talk). Self nom at 21:04, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

  • 5x expansion verified. New enough, long enough, well-referenced. Offline ref AGF. For a first-time article, this is in very good shape. I took the liberty of adding links to other Wikipedia pages. From a technical point of view, I would like to see in the lead a mention of what you're talking about in layman's terms: is this learning theory, or image processing, or what general field? (I was unable to find a Wikipedia page about "image constancy"; perhaps you could locate it under another name?} Similarly, please add categorization at the end. In the references that don't include page numbers, please note the page number/s for the information you cite. And per DYK Rule D2, each paragraph needs at least one citation. If, for example, the list of 4 kinds of demons is from the same source, see WP:Citing sources#Repeated citations for how to format this, or drop me a note on my talk page. Best, Yoninah (talk) 22:18, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
  • I think I have made the changes you have requested, as for the page numbers, I have returned the books, I cannot recall for the specific page numbers, but the whole book is really relevant to the topic anyways. Jimmierock (talk) 20:34, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
  • OK, it really looks good. Please add a cite to the second paragraph under History, and we're ready to roll! Yoninah (talk) 21:08, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
  • Everything checks out. Offline ref AGF. Good to go. Yoninah (talk) 21:29, 7 April 2012 (UTC)