Template:Did you know nominations/Ordinal (liturgy)
Appearance
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by RoySmith (talk) 17:00, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Ordinal (liturgy), Edwardine Ordinals
( Back to T:TDYK )
( Article history links: )
- ... that despite two 16th-century books often being referred to as the Edwardine Ordinals, the word "ordinal" was not applied to them until the 17th century? Source: Brightman, The English Rite. Vol. 1. Pg. cxxx
Created by Pbritti (talk). Self-nominated at 05:57, 2 September 2022 (UTC).
- Interesting detailed articles, on fine sources, offline sources accepted AGF, no copyvio obvious. I guess the hook works. I am no friend of "see also" sections, but the mix there doesn't hurt. Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:34, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
- Haha, Gerda Arendt. Glad you got my gentle joking. Thanks! ~ Pbritti (talk) 21:51, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
- @Gerda Arendt: what's this nomination's status? theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 02:25, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- I am so sorry, I forgot the icon. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:41, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- @Gerda Arendt: what's this nomination's status? theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 02:25, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- Haha, Gerda Arendt. Glad you got my gentle joking. Thanks! ~ Pbritti (talk) 21:51, 2 September 2022 (UTC)