Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/OBB Personenverkehr AG v. Sachs

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:33, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

OBB Personenverkehr AG v. Sachs

[edit]

Created by Notecardforfree (talk). Self-nominated at 22:43, 7 December 2015 (UTC).

  • If the primary hook is too boring for people, you could also try these hooks:
Thanks in advance to whomever reviews this. Best, -- Notecardforfree (talk) 17:52, 1 January 2016 (UTC)


General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: There was plenty of prose which was flagged in Earwig's copyvio detector. After filtering out quotations and long pronouns, I found only a few phrases. There doesn't appear to be any copyright violation since they tend to be very short and can only be worded one way e.g. "from a Massachusetts-based travel agent". Also, I would go with the original hook, as it is the most useful. I haven't assessed the other two hooks. Jolly Ω Janner 23:17, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

  • Note: I've struck the unreviewed hooks. (I agree they're not nearly as good as the original: not as interesting, and both commentators seems to prefer the obscure.) BlueMoonset (talk) 05:28, 7 January 2016 (UTC)